Chapter 5: New Design Theories and Technology
Changes that
affect organizational design strategies
The Knowledge Society
Information
Work
Changes in the Environment
Contingency Design Theory
Assumptions
The Canons of organizational structure
The Contingencies that affect Design
Choices
Technology and
Communication
Forms
Strategies for
integrating units
New Organizational Forms
a.
Description:
a society in which a great portion of the work is not production work, but
knowledge work.
Drucker:
Knowledge workers will not be the majority in the knowledge society. But in
many countries, if not most developed countries, they will be the largest
single group in the population and the workforce. And even if outnumbered by
other groups, knowledge workers will be the group that gives the emerging
knowledge society its character, its leadership, its social profile. They may
not be the ruling class of the knowledge society, but they already are
its leading class. And in their characteristics, their social position,
their values, and their expectations, they differ fundamentally from any group
in history that has ever occupied the leading, let alone the dominant,
position.
Bartlett
and Goshal: “In the benevolent, high-growth environment that followed World War
II, strategy, structure, and systems offered much-needed discipline, focus, and
control. Today’s economic environment is different. Overcapacity and intense
competition are the norm in most global businesses. The lines separating
businesses have blurred as technologies and markets converge, creating new
growth opportunities where traditional businesses intersect. And, most notably,
the scarcest corporate resources are less often the financial funds that top
management controls than the knowledge and expertise of the people on the front
lines.”
b.
Examples
i.
Scientists
ii. Engineers
iii. Attorneys
iv. Financial
Analysts
v. X-ray
technicians
c.
Characteristics
i.
The
only tangible output is a document.
ii. Critical
for production work
iii. Requires
formal education
1.) “Education
will become the center of the knowledge society, and schooling its key
institution.”—Drucker
2.) “We
will redefine what it means to be an ‘educated person.’”—Drucker
3.) Requires
continuing education
iv. More
competitive
Drucker:
The knowledge society will inevitably become far more competitive than any society we have yet known—for the
simple reason that with knowledge being universally accessible, there are no
excuses for nonperformance. There will be no “poor” countries. There will only
be ignorant countries. And the same will be true for individual companies,
individual industries, and individual organizations of any kind. It will be
true for the individual, too. In fact, developed [307] societies have already
become infinitely more competitive for the individual than were the societies
of the early twentieth century—let alone earlier societies, those of the
nineteenth or eighteenth centuries. Then, most people had no opportunity to
rise out of the “class” into which they were born, with most individuals
following their fathers in their work and in their station in life.
v. More
workers will be knowledge specialists—requiring a group—an organization—to have
all the necessary elements of knowledge for the work.
a.
Gathering, entering, formatting and
processing information.
b.
Clerical
jobs, data entry, telemarketing
c.
“Pink collar” jobs because usually filled by women
d.
Knowledge
and information workers account for 40% of mfg jobs and 80% of service jobs.
a.
Shorter product life cycles.
Ford made the Model T from 1903 to 1927 with no significant changes.
b.
Time
to production reduced.
c.
Technology changes are more rapid.
d.
Globalization
has introduced new competitors.
e.
More public awareness leading to
greater public oversight and control.
a.
A bureaucracy will out-perform other designs in the
long-run because it is the most efficient, according to Burns and Stalker.
However, in periods of change, it is too slow to adapt. The relational form is
better at adapting.
b.
Therefore,
there is not one best way to
structure an organization.
c.
The most effective organizational design is contingent
upon several environmental and organizational variables
2.
The Canons of organizational structure according to contingency design
theory. These are the areas in which managers make choices about influential organizational design.
a.
Formalization:
the degree to which the organization has well-defined roles, strict division of
labor into relatively small tasks, and rules and procedures that apply to most
activities.
b.
Centralization: the degree to which
control is centralized in management.
c.
Staff
Qualifications: the degree to which workers and staff have to obtain
specialized training or degrees to carry out their work effectively.
d.
Span of Control: the number of employees
who report to a single manager or supervisor. Narrow spans of control are important
when managers must check for details, special problems, or errors. Wider spans
of control are workable when there are not many exceptions and the work is
pretty much the same all the time.
e.
Communication and
Coordination: the frequency, formality, and medium of communication among
members.
f.
Interorganizational
Relationships: the degree to which they form and maintain stable
relationships with other groups or organizations.

a.
Technology
i.
Description
1.) Tools,
techniques and actions used to transform inputs into outputs
2.) Can
be processes and procedures as well as machinery and computers
ii. Variables
1.) Routine
a.) Well-understood
process
b.) Few
exceptions or unexpected problems
c.) Good
candidate for automation
d.) Worker
has little control over definition of the process. Engineers decide how to do
the work.
e.) Requires vertical, formal, written, impersonal communication.
2.) Non-routine
a.) Process
cannot be broken into parts
b.) Procedure
is not well-understood
c.) Many
exceptions
d.) Human
judgment often necessary
e.) Requires direct, unscheduled, personal communication.
iii. Uncertainty
increases as technologies become less routine.
1.) Traditional
strategies work best with routine tasks.
2.) Relational
strategies work best with non-routine tasks.
3.) Communication
must be more direct and intense in uncertain situations.
a.) This
increases the cost of the communication.
b.) “The
organization should enact the least costly communication system that can
adequately meet its needs for communication and coordination.” C&P call
this “communication adequacy.”
b.
Interdependence
between Units
i.
The
degree to which the parts of the process must work together to transform inputs
to outputs
ii. Types
1.) Pooled
interdependence
a.) Each
unit executes the same procedures separately. e.g.
each McDonald’s does the same thing without depending on the other locations.
b.) Communication
needs are low
i.) create rules
ii.) develop formal written plans that take the place of other
forms of communication
iii.) vertical communication between managers and units
iv.) strong links or electronic networks not required
2.) Sequential
interdependence
a.) Each
unit executes the next step in the process, making each dependent on the
previous unit.. e.g. an
assembly line.
b.) Communication
needs are moderate
i.) active planning by participants, guided by management
ii.) vertical communication between managers and some horizontal
communication to achieve coordination
3.) Reciprocal
interdependence
a.) Each
unit may be involved at several steps in the process. e.g.
software development
b.) Communication
needs are high
i.) methods used by pooled and sequential interdependence may
help, but more is required
ii.) horizontal communication by workers themselves—not just
managers
iii.) unscheduled meetings
iv.) face-to-face communication
c.
Organizational
Environment
i.
Environment
is everything outside the organization’s boundaries
1.) Domestic
and foreign competitors
2.) Customers
and clients
3.) Government
agencies and regulators
4.) General
economic conditions
5.) Technologies
6.) Financial
resources
7.) Labor
markets
8.) Raw
materials suppliers
9.) General
culture
ii. Variables
1.) Complexity:
the number of significant elements in the environment
2.) Stability:
rate of change in the elements and their relationships
iii. Types
1.) Simple,
Stable
a.) Low
uncertainty
b.) Traditional
strategies
2.) Complex,
Stable
a.) Medium
uncertainty
b.) Traditional
strategies
3.) Simple,
Unstable
a.) Medium
uncertainty
b.) Relational
strategies
4.) Complex,
Unstable
a.) High
uncertainty
b.) Relational
strategies
c.) Need
special positions to deal with changes
d.) More
need for boundary spanners
e.) More
need for integrated roles
4.
If variables conflict—e.g. non-routine
technology and simple, stable environment—two
possible solutions:
a.
Adopt the most complex solution to be ready for the
most difficult challenge.
b.
The
organization must under-perform because it is faced with contradictions.
Every operational aspect of business as we have known it
is open to review and subject to change given the way in which the Internet and
the technologies that make use of it can improve upon current business
practices.
There’s a sharp dividing line between companies that cling
to the past and those that invent the future. That line, increasingly, is no
longer between older, established companies and spanking new ones. It’s between
those organizations that are capable of using the Web to spur innovation and
those that aren’t. Surprisingly, what distinguishes many of the most Web-savvy
companies is not their technical prowess but their imagination. Everyone has
access to Net technology. The crucial question is: Who has the brains, guts,
and creativity to take full advantage of it?
When an industry is fundamentally changing, as is banking
in the era of electronic commerce, the risk of being stranded in a dying
business is great.
a.
Email
b.
Electronic
Calendars
c.
Voice Mail
d.
Audio
conferencing
e.
Computer conferencing
f.
Expert Systems
g.
Groupware
h.
Networks
i.
VPN
j.
Inexpensive high-bandwidth WANs
k.
Middleware
l.
Application Integration
m.
Internet
Technologies
AMR
Research indicates that Business-to-Business (B2B) e-commerce will be adopted
at a more accelerated rate than many companies realize, reaching $5.7 Trillion
by 2004. The firm estimates that industry leaders will move 60 to 100 percent
of their transactions to the Internet over the next two years. Furthermore, the
Report states that companies that do not take an aggressive approach to B2B
e-commerce and prepare for digital marketplaces, will lose customers and
ultimately fail.
i.
XML
ii. XBRL
XBRL
(or Extensible Business Reporting Language) is a freely available Internet-based
language for business reporting. It is a framework, that
provides the business community a standards based method to prepare, publish,
reliably extract and automatically exchange business reports of companies and
the information they contain. Whatever new reporting standards are considered appropriate, it is likely to be richer in disclosure than
what we have today and will need XBRL to facilitate.
James
Castellano, Chair of the AICPA, 2/14/02,
statement to Congress re: the need for accounting oversight changes after the
Enron scandal.
n.
Electronic Exchanges
i.
What
is an exchange?
1.) An
exchange is an alliance of suppliers and vendors in a specific industry that
use software to post RFPs and RFQs often using a reverse auction like
Priceline.com to bid on requests.
2.) In
effect, an exchange can turn a supply chain into a source of revenue by
creating a marketplace and earning a fee
3.) Business
Week, June 5, 2000
Like no other Internet businesses to date, e-marketplaces tap
into something primal: When lots of people get together in one place, commerce
happens.
Even more fundamental, e-marketplaces will likely alter the
whole process by which raw materials are converted into products and delivered
to customers. Think of today’s typical supply chain as a narrow, meandering
trail at night, from which you dare not stray for fear of stumbling into a
ditch. But once day breaks, you can see the whole landscape—so you cut across a
field, avoid potholes and dead ends, give a helping shout to friends, maybe
even meet new people. As the era of e-marketplaces dawns, the supply chain is
morphing into a supply web, spurring faster time to market, access to new
suppliers and customers, and quicker entry into new markets. Says Carl Bass,
CEO of construction-services marketplace Buzzsaw.com: “It’s a change on the
scale of the Industrial Revolution.”
ii.
How
much business will go through an exchange?
1.) The
research varies, but all the projections are staggering.
AMR Research indicates that Business-to-Business (B2B)
e-commerce will be adopted at a more accelerated rate than many companies
realize, reaching $5.7 Trillion by 2004. The firm estimates that industry
leaders will move 60 to 100 percent of their transactions to the Internet over
the next two years. Furthermore, the Report states that companies that do not
take an aggressive approach to B2B e-commerce and prepare for digital
marketplaces, will lose customers and ultimately fail.
Jupiter Research has released a study with pulse-quickening
projections about the growth of the business-to-business commerce market.
Jupiter’s prediction that B-to-B commerce will expand from $336 million this
year to $6.3 trillion in 2005 is likely to raise the heart rate of even the
most composed IT administrators as they try to figure out how to accommodate
such exponential expansion.
While 15% to 20% of business-to-consumer transactions have gone
online, 80% of business-to-business transactions will be conducted online in
six to eight years, he says.
Jupiter found that the computer and telecommunications markets
should become the largest online B-to-B market in terms of sales, topping $1
trillion by 2005. Four other industries—food and beverage, motor vehicle and
parts, industrial equipment and supplies, and construction and real estate—are
expected to exceed $500 billion within five years.
Bank of America
Whitepaper
We estimate the U.S.
business-to-business (B2B) economy at a staggering $50 trillion. Five times
greater than the GDP itself, B2B interactions offer a wealth of opportunity for
enablers of e-businesses, e-commerce and supply chain automation. Given what
Internet technology can bring to bear, we believe every dollar of corporate
revenue, and each penny of business expense, should be traced through the
economy with every transaction carefully evaluated.
Business-to-business (B2B) will be much larger in total dollar
volume, accounting for 92% of total e-commerce by 2003, according to IDC.
Today, B2Bs account for only a small percentage of total U.S.
industrial sales. But by 2004, they are expected to claim $1.4 trillion in
sales, or about 9% of the country’s total industrial sales, according to
Forrester. Three years from now, Forrester predicts, as much as 53% of Internet
transactions could go through e-markets. In fact, online business trade has
just reached its hyper-growth stage this year. Between now and 2004, e-trade
will grow by 200% a year, Forrester predicts. In short, the industry may
struggle for a time. But nearly everyone agrees that it will prosper in coming
years.
iii. How
quickly are these exchanges growing?
1.) Bank
of America analysts project the inflection point could occur within the next
12-18 months.
2.) Bank
of America
Whitepaper
Market maturity. Earlier this year,
InformationWeek reported that only 12 of the 100 largest U.S.
companies have unveiled an e-procurement initiative. Most of these initiatives
remain at an early stage of deployment. But we expect an increasing number of
e-procurement projects to approach completion in the months ahead, which should
help the industry gain additional traction and credibility. The mid-market and
low end are even less penetrated. These markets remain
untouched for three key reasons. First, e-procurement products have emerged
only in the last 12-24 months and vendors have thus far focused on picking the
low-hanging fruit at the high end, where license transactions can exceed $1
million. Second, smaller companies tend to be technology laggards that wait for
products to move into the mainstream before making investments. And third, the
infrastructure for outsourced applications is raw, having emerged over the past
few quarters. Small to mid-sized companies often lack the resources to host
their own applications. As a result, we believe e-procurement will begin
filtering down to the low end of the market once this outsourcing
infrastructure begins to mature. See the “E-Procurement Trends” section below
for a more detailed discussion of the application outsourcing model. As a
result, we believe e-procurement will begin filtering down to the low end of
the market once this outsourcing infrastructure begins to mature. See the
“E-Procurement Trends” section below for a more detailed discussion of the
application outsourcing model.
iv. What
are some examples of exchanges?
1.) Covisint
is a major auto industry exchange including, Ford, GM and Chrysler
2.) There
are exchanges planned for almost every industry: lumber, chemicals, steel,
marketing services, energy, oil, food and beverages, even funeral supplies.
SCANA is a South Carolina energy
exchange. Michelin is contemplating an exchange, as is Georgia Pacific.
4.
Managerial
linking roles: a person with authority given the task to achieve an integration solution
a.
e.g. NASA: a materials
engineer may work 50% with Nose-cone, 30% with booster, and 20% with Materials
engineering lab
b.
Keeps
focus on outcomes instead of partisan, departmental issues
c.
Benefits coordination
d.
Requires
intensive communication
e.
Can create ambiguities—to whom do I report?
f.
Extra communication takes extra time and effort
a.
EDI—the old way
b.
In
the past, could be stymied by incompatible systems—not anymore with XML-based
integration tools.
c.
GRAPHIC
a.
cost-benefit analysis
b.
geographical dispersion
c.
cultural strategy in place
|
The Old Assumptions
|
The New Possibility
|
|
Factories with clocklike precision
|
. Factories with workers “madly scurrying to
assemble sofas as they saw fit” and “productivity and quality were going
through the roof.”
|
|
Products priced according to cost, with a margin
for profit
|
Products that used to cost $3 million a copy,
selling for $9,999, then zero, “yet by redefining his market his company was
making more money than ever.”
|
|
Only managers can make the hard decisions
|
Employees looking for ways to eliminate their own
jobs because those who succeeded were rewarded with new jobs helping the
company to grow.
|
|
Going into business requires a ransom of risk capital
|
Web-based companies that begin with nothing to make
a significant profit.
|
|
Businesses fear regulators and local activists
|
A plant manager who “dissolved the boundary between
factory and community while causing profitability to soar.”
|
|
Business must track every dollar, asset and action
|
A business “which had grown bigger than Boeing,
Intel, or Motorola with no budgets, no central planning, and no job
descriptions”
|
|
A business must build an economy of scale to make a
profit.
|
A business can develop an economy of locality or an
economy of time and make a profit.
|
|
Customizations increase cost
|
Customizations benefit the customer and build the
business
|
|
Work is a necessary evil—Adam’s folly
|
“The workplace is becoming a primary means for
personal fulfillment” as “institutions like churches, communities, even
families, which once provided individuals with identity, affiliation,
meaning, and support, are eroding.”
|
Today’s pioneers have embarked on a new frontier, some in
search of riches, others in search of freedom, all in search of the new. Unlike
the West of old this frontier is not one of place. It is a frontier of
technologies, ideas, and values. The new pioneers celebrate individuality over
conformity among their employees and customers alike. They deploy technology to
distribute rather than consolidate authority and creativity. They compete
through resilience instead of resistance, through adaptation instead of
control. In a time of dizzying complexity and change, they realize that tightly
drawn strategies become brittle while shared purpose endures. Capitalism, in
short, is merging with humanism.
a.
ad hoc structures assembled to
meet a specific demands
b.
Characteristics
i.
disaggregated—essential pieces are in several different
organizations
ii. assembled by a broker
iii. market mechanisms control the relationships—competitive
bidding. See info on electronic exchanges above
iv. full disclosure information systems—build trust and
accountability
c.
Unique because:
i.
the organization is not a self-contained entity
ii. jobs are temporary—some say even obsolete
a.
no physical existence:
everything cobbled together electronically from suppliers
b.
Kingston
Technologies
c.
Dell Computer