Comparison of Organizational Strategies
|
|
Traditional |
Relational |
Cultural |
|
Names |
Scientific Management Directed Management Hard Management Theory X |
Humanistic Management Soft Management Theory Y |
Visionary Management Cultural Management Theory Z
|
|
The picture of human
beings |
“Scientific management is
based on the idea that the average worker is a lazy slob who is only redeemed
by greed.” M & W “Men will never do good unless necessity drives them to it.”—Machiavelli,
Discourses, I.3 (p. 112). |
“Humanistic management, on
the other-hand, is based on the idea that the average worker is a model human
being, intelligent, creative, and self-motivating.” M & W |
Human beings are "symbol-using animals" (Kenneth Burke) and are “stubborn seekers of meaning” (John Gardner quoted in Peters and Waterman)
|
|
The picture of the
organization |
A machine: a place for
everyone and everyone in their place A bureaucracy: “capable of
attaining the highest degree of efficiency and is in this sense formally the
most rational known means of carrying out imperative control over human
beings” |
A place of personal
fulfillment and self-actualization: “an organization in which human values
are as important as production values. The pyramid structure may still apply,
but . . . individuals participate in organizational decision making and
evaluation” (Littlejohn on Argyris’ picture of the ideal organization) |
“Systems composed of ideas, the meaning of which must be managed” (Joanne Martin quoted in Peters and Waterman).
|
|
The picture of the
manager |
“The job of the manager is
to break down jobs into their component parts, so that even the dumbest
persons can master them, and design incentive systems, so that even the
laziest will exert themselves.” M & W |
“The job of the manager is
to ensure that work is interesting enough to bring out the best in the firm’s
employees, by dint of devolving decisions to shop-floor workers, creating
self-managing teams, and encouraging workers to make suggestions about how
the company might be improved.” M & W |
The manager is a
rhetorical actor: “The [leader] not only creates the rational and tangible
aspects of organisations, such as structure and
technology, but also is the creator of symbols, ideologies, language,
beliefs, rituals, and myths” (Andrew Pettigrew quoted in Peters and
Waterman). |
|
Key ideas |
Specialization Hierarchicalization Centralization |
Higher order needs over monetary
incentives Social factors affect
behavior. Communication affects
behavior. Decentralization Flattened Structures Participatory Decision
Making Use of informal
communication networks |
Meaning Culture Symbolic Influence Administrative Rhetoric
|
|
Examples |
Taylor and Scientific
Management Weber and Bureaucracy Reengineering, which tried to adapt Taylorism to the age of the computer. |
Higher-level needs with
Maslow, Herzberg, Argyris Contingency Leadership by
Feidler Barnard, the last of the
“practical theorists” Theory Y by McGregor Empowerment by Peters |
Peters and Waterman, In Search of Excellence Collins and Porras, Built to Last
|
|
Means of Motivation
and Control |
Rules Rewards Roles |
Fulfill higher order needs More than money Do more things Do better things Change the group |
Unobtrusive Control—Precision Instruments of Management “Participative Culture Making” Symbolic Means of Influence Metaphor Myth Rituals and Ceremonies Purpose Values Vision |
|
Leadership |
“The Commander” Focus on management over
leadership Fayol’s Five Functions Plan Command Control Coordinate Organize |
Transactional Contingent Employee-centered Communication-centered |
Visionary Transformational Not necessarily
charismatic, but a “clock builder” |
|
Strengths |
Provides the structure
that all human beings need. Can produce efficient
output in for a limited time in stable situations. If properly applied, need
not create labor-management tension. |
More precise instruments
of influence Higher job satisfaction More effective than
traditional in rapidly changing environments |
Provides significant influential “leverage”—a lot for a little in the long run. Fills in the gaps that can never be covered by traditional instruments of management. Necessary to gain an advantage in a fluid, competitive business environment. Can effectively counter
the over-emphasis on self-interest that can arise from traditional and
relational methods. |
|
Weaknesses |
Frequent communication
breakdowns Filtering Paradox Structural Barriers Trained Incapacity Ill-suited for
better-educated employees Sacrifices flexibility and
responsiveness for consistency and predictability |
No support for any
improvement in productivity or performance Can become self-defeating
if not tied to clear objectives Fails to account for
affect of structure and function Assumes that happiness and
the absence of conflict are necessary |
To be effective, requires skills most managers don’t have. Does not address the specific discursive mechanics of management. Difficult to use because of the wide number of variables. If not complete, can be rejected by employees and have a negative effect. Can lead to abuses as owners and managers use culture to advance partisan interests.
|